Create your own GitHub profile
Sign up for your own profile on GitHub, the best place to host code, manage projects, and build software alongside 40 million developers.
Sign up-
IBM
- The Netherlands
- Sign in to view email
Popular repositories
1,421 contributions in the last year
Activity overview
Contribution activity
December 2019
Created a pull request in nodejs/node that received 16 comments
test: work around ENOTEMPTY when cleaning tmp dir
Replace the homegrown rimrafsync implementation in test/common with
a call to fs.rmdirSync(path, { recursive: true }).
Fixes: #30620
Fixes: #30844
cc
+8
−50
•
16
comments
- src,test,tools: forbid usage of v8::Persistent
- deps: V8: cherry-pick d3a1a5b6c491
- src: make --use-largepages a runtime option
- build: Auto-load ICU data from --with-icu-default-data-dir
- src: unregister Isolate with platform before disposing
- doc: clarify Tier 2 implications in BUILDING.md
- src: accept single argument in getProxyDetails
- readline: promote _getCursorPos to public api
- fs: synchronize close with other I/O for streams
- fs: add synchronous retries to rimraf
- test: wait for stream close before writing to file
- src: improve checked uv loop close output
- deps: upgrade to libuv 1.34.0
- test: skip the unsupported test cases for IBM i
- http,https: increase server headers timeout
- child_process: create proper public API for `channel`
- fix -Wunused-but-set-variable
- doc: remove binaries for Windows from README
- test: skip uv_(get|set)_process_title on IBMi
- test: skip some test cases on IBMi
- Those tests fail under NetBSD and OpenBSD.
- fs: bring back macos-specific copyfile(3)
- win: implement reflink (UV_FS_COPYFILE_FICLONE_FORCE) on ReFS
- ibmi: fix the false isatty() issue on IBMi
- fs: add uv_fs_mkstemp
Created an issue in nodejs/node that received 2 comments
Assertion `!flush_tasks_' failed in parallel/test-worker-memory
Today's master, commit a9abc17:
=== release test-worker-memory ===
Path: parallel/test-worker-memory
run() called with n=15 (numWorkers=4)
run() ca…
2
comments