Send dhcp-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
Advertising
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dhcp-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. fixed-address problem (Bernard Fay)
2. RE: fixed-address problem (Sherman Lilly)
3. Re: dhcpd crashes (Shawn Routhier)
4. RE: fixed-address problem (Patrick Trapp)
5. RE: fixed-address problem (Sherman Lilly)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:30:57 -0500
From: Bernard Fay <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: fixed-address problem
Message-ID:
<cah3ae4zcbwohaydnroldwtlpmxghai7-cjhhb2xmgjxltj3...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello everyonw,
I am unable to assign fixed IP addresses to host.
I have the following configuration:
option domain-name "cts.org";
option domain-name-servers ns1.cts.org;
default-lease-time 300;
max-lease-time 1500;
subnet 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
# range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;
option broadcast-address 192.168.99.255;
option routers 192.168.99.1;
option domain-name "cts.org";
group {
host vault {
option host-name "vault.cts.org";
hardware ethernet 52:af:12:cf:87:c5;
fixed-address 192.168.98.101;
}
}
}
With "range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;" the host is assigned the first
available IP address. If I disable "range" like in the shown configuration,
the log says: "dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:af:12:cf:87:c5 via eth1: network
192.168.99.0/24: no free leases".
This ISC DHCP 4.2.5.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Bernard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160126/e19bc847/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:35:11 +0000
From: Sherman Lilly <[email protected]>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
Message-ID:
<775174236735ba4e9c606781c315ef870376705...@main-mailbox3.knox-main.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Your subnet is wrong
Sherman Lilly
(865) 215-3536
Senior Systems Administrator
Knox County
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Bernard Fay [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: fixed-address problem
Hello everyonw,
I am unable to assign fixed IP addresses to host.
I have the following configuration:
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
option domain-name-servers ns1.cts.org<http://ns1.cts.org>;
default-lease-time 300;
max-lease-time 1500;
subnet 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
# range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;
option broadcast-address 192.168.99.255;
option routers 192.168.99.1;
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
group {
host vault {
option host-name "vault.cts.org<http://vault.cts.org>";
hardware ethernet 52:af:12:cf:87:c5;
fixed-address 192.168.98.101;
}
}
}
With "range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;" the host is assigned the first
available IP address. If I disable "range" like in the shown configuration, the
log says: "dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:af:12:cf:87:c5 via eth1: network
192.168.99.0/24<http://192.168.99.0/24>: no free leases".
This ISC DHCP 4.2.5.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Bernard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160126/1e8ec07d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:44:10 -0800
From: Shawn Routhier <[email protected]>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: dhcpd crashes
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
This is likely one of the issues we fixed in the DDNS code - we had some issues
with stale pointers and such. As we haven?t heard of any issues for a while I
believe
they are fixed now.
It would be best to upgrade - we released 4.2.8 almost a year ago and that is
going to be the last release in the 4.2.x series so 4.2.2 is fairly old.
regards,
Shawn Routhier
ISC
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 AM, Chip Pleasants <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm hoping someone could point me in the right direction with an issue I'm
> seeing with dhcpd 4.2.2 on Raspbian. Multiple times per day dhcpd just
> stops. I do not see anything in the logs. I was able to do a trace file
> listed below. I would upgrade to a new version, but it doesn't seem like
> Raspbian has an updated version. I can provide configs if required. I do have
> ddns, v4, and v6 running. Any help is suggested.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chip
>
>
>
> root@fw:~# cat dhcpd-crashing-output.txt
> DHCPREQUEST for 172.19.2.177 from 24:da:9b:13:3d:0f
> (android-3f443e4ce12d0232) via eth0
> DHCPACK on 172.19.2.177 to 24:da:9b:13:3d:0f (android-3f443e4ce12d0232) via
> eth0
> ../../../lib/dns/client.c:2833: REQUIRE((((uctx) != ((void *)0)) && (((const
> isc__magic_t *)(uctx))->magic == ((('U') << 24 | ('c') << 16 | ('t') << 8 |
> ('x')))))) failed.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:24:20 +0000
From: Patrick Trapp <[email protected]>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
Message-ID:
<1d507d610594d14f86d40d77c17e9e66264bc...@exchangedsb.ruralnex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I don't see a problem with the subnet. OP just isn't using the entire pool,
right?
I'm not sure what the effect of the "group" declaration is. I believe on my
configurations where I'm assigning a static address, I'm just using a "host"
declaration. I don't declare these hosts within the subnet declaration, either.
I would be inclined to try the host declaration outside the subnet first.
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Sherman Lilly [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 1:35 PM
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
Your subnet is wrong
Sherman Lilly
(865) 215-3536
Senior Systems Administrator
Knox County
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Bernard Fay [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: fixed-address problem
Hello everyonw,
I am unable to assign fixed IP addresses to host.
I have the following configuration:
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
option domain-name-servers ns1.cts.org<http://ns1.cts.org>;
default-lease-time 300;
max-lease-time 1500;
subnet 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
# range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;
option broadcast-address 192.168.99.255;
option routers 192.168.99.1;
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
group {
host vault {
option host-name "vault.cts.org<http://vault.cts.org>";
hardware ethernet 52:af:12:cf:87:c5;
fixed-address 192.168.98.101;
}
}
}
With "range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;" the host is assigned the first
available IP address. If I disable "range" like in the shown configuration, the
log says: "dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:af:12:cf:87:c5 via eth1: network
192.168.99.0/24<http://192.168.99.0/24>: no free leases".
This ISC DHCP 4.2.5.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Bernard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160126/b5dba121/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:27:43 +0000
From: Sherman Lilly <[email protected]>
To: Users of ISC DHCP <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
Message-ID:
<775174236735ba4e9c606781c315ef870376706...@main-mailbox3.knox-main.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Your subnet clause is
subnet 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
Your fixed address is
fixed-address 192.168.98.101;
You can't service a subnet out side of the subnet in your declaration
Sherman Lilly
(865) 215-3536
Senior Systems Administrator
Knox County
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Patrick Trapp [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 4:24 PM
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
I don't see a problem with the subnet. OP just isn't using the entire pool,
right?
I'm not sure what the effect of the "group" declaration is. I believe on my
configurations where I'm assigning a static address, I'm just using a "host"
declaration. I don't declare these hosts within the subnet declaration, either.
I would be inclined to try the host declaration outside the subnet first.
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Sherman Lilly [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 1:35 PM
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: RE: fixed-address problem
Your subnet is wrong
Sherman Lilly
(865) 215-3536
Senior Systems Administrator
Knox County
________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Bernard Fay [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: fixed-address problem
Hello everyonw,
I am unable to assign fixed IP addresses to host.
I have the following configuration:
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
option domain-name-servers ns1.cts.org<http://ns1.cts.org>;
default-lease-time 300;
max-lease-time 1500;
subnet 192.168.99.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
# range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;
option broadcast-address 192.168.99.255;
option routers 192.168.99.1;
option domain-name "cts.org<http://cts.org>";
group {
host vault {
option host-name "vault.cts.org<http://vault.cts.org>";
hardware ethernet 52:af:12:cf:87:c5;
fixed-address 192.168.98.101;
}
}
}
With "range 192.168.99.201 192.168.99.250;" the host is assigned the first
available IP address. If I disable "range" like in the shown configuration, the
log says: "dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:af:12:cf:87:c5 via eth1: network
192.168.99.0/24<http://192.168.99.0/24>: no free leases".
This ISC DHCP 4.2.5.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Bernard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160126/5dc07a3c/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
End of dhcp-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 12
******************************************
