@_cweb: XDomainRequest remains available in IE10 for WebDevs to ignore just as they have since its original invention.

@mnot @dalmaer: I'm always interested in simpler designs (although my last one didn't get much traction.) Did you write yours up somewhere?

@mbrevoort "Proper" is such a lovely word.

@Twitter folks: Test your new design in IE9. Fails with SCRIPT16385: Not implemented t1-core-en-201202091115.js, line 36 character 6165

woot woot! CORS for XHR in IE10. blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2…

@Shmuelie: Right, but what's in the target file? How would your CustomRules.js reference its code? (Or wouldn't it?) Feel free to mail me!

@Shmuelie: One question is how you'd partition such a script? I'd considered doing a #include like thing, but that seemed hard to manage...

Just had someone I just met ask: "Have you heard of #Fiddler2?". I managed to get them to describe it to me. :-D

@Shmuelie: No direct way. Once you're at that point, writing a .NET Extension is really likely your best path forward.

Microsoft Finally Explains Windows 8 on ARM: Desktop and Office 15 Applications Will Be Included bit.ly/xX5Fti

How do we reduce population growth? By reducing infant mortality. I was surprised too. b-gat.es/ymQq7z

Uh, where the heck did my Twitter lists go?

115 pages of the #Fiddler2 book done. Now wondering now about the conversion of Word pages to #Kindle pages.

Ugh... new twitter layout making me dizzy.

@Shmuelie: Basically, no. It primarily exists for folks who don't have .NET2/3/3.5 installed (e.g. Windows 8 self hosters).

@Shmuelie: :-) almost. "Beta" for Fiddler means: "The 5% of users willing to try new stuff." That, by definition, includes all .NET4 users.

@Shmuelie: The .NET4 version of Fiddler will probably *always* be Beta. Beta doesn't really mean what you might think.

@jeremiahg: There are gobs of problems with that. Routability, HTTPS and Zones are the obvious ones.

I hear all this talk about managing complexity. By then it's too late. You should have been cultivating simplicity.

@dakami: *I* would never sign two certificates with the same serial number. :-P