That's your opinion. That's not our opinion.
> Yeah I understand what your intent is and I'm not flaming you. I have a
> problem with the wording in that claus. Unfortunately you're not a
> lawyer so your stated intent means little, it's the language in the
> license that has meaning.
We're not changing the wording in the license just because you have a
problem with it. Unless some lawyer wants to explain to me why this
wording doesn't do what I want it to do, and unless I actually believe
they are operating in the best interests of BitMover, the language
stands as it is.
Unless you are competing with us you have no reason to be worried.
----- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Alvin Oga: "Re: RAID backup - media"
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [BK PATCH] pcibios_* removals for 2.5.40"
- In reply to: tom_gall@mac.com: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
- Next in thread: Rob Landley: "Re: New BK License Problem?"