IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teep-protocol-21
review-ietf-teep-protocol-21-artart-lc-hollenbeck-2025-10-07-00

I've been asked to review the subject draft as a member of the ARTART review
team. The draft is well written and very thorough in its description of the
Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning (TEEP) protocol.

I found only one issue that needs attention. In Sections 4.4 and 4.6, there's a
description of the err-msg (error message) parameter:

"The err-msg parameter is human-readable diagnostic text that MUST be encoded
using UTF-8 [RFC3629] using Net-Unicode form [RFC5198] with max 128 bytes."

This is helpful, but there's no indication of the human language that should be
used to interpret the diagnostic text. I recommend inclusion of an additional
parameter, perhaps "err-lang", that can be used to identify the language of the
error message. The value of this parameter must be a language tag as specified
in RFC 5646.