IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-11
review-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-11-genart-lc-bryant-2026-01-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-01-02
Requested 2025-12-12
Authors Ray Bellis
I-D last updated 2026-02-02 (Latest revision 2026-01-30)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -06 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Ralf Weber (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Vladimír Čunát
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/xs8W-NJ-M3A2F37s0GVbHMh8ZaA
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-01-14
review-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-11-genart-lc-bryant-2026-01-14-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes-11
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2026-01-14
IETF LC End Date: 2026-01-02
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: From a Genart perspective I believe that this is ready.

Major issues:I would echo the amplification attack concerns expressed in other
reviews and assume that they will be addressed in due course.

I note that Nits catches the use of a an IPv4 example without a corresponding
IPv6 example. I personally think that this OK in this example, but the IESG may
have a policy concern over this.

Minor issues:None

Nits/editorial comments:None