Return-Path: X-Original-To: keytrans@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: keytrans@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01F7B913061 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:02:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.848 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaxAoDi9oWAV for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E1FB91305A for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8c710439535so312356385a.1 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:02:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1771376551; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=drGnXeaaEErM/sfUbUYfBznGH+MnRsaoxgYAfEjn1YJucWbopN8gMDmWIVf9XH+cfm kw7I96NY6yrA4IhQEYrV7DcIV+iNyCRKWUhnydkAriDBu/cgsGcnQJcS7I8Q+mcprRTl MY/tF2wncZUfCSK/D2kW4HMDSyhThIR7WNjNV5+ALe39Qk12Q0PFwmzGr7wl6UAuJxdu ydENGjgVoTZvk4YxZ7uYEGdK2EZZCRbeEuUwbM6j13YZbqu8DODh70nhEfdgqBj6WlbT af48yhWNpCV9Es9xt1rrnta5OIK5/Lauf7nicIBrILKtIgZ/6Od5D7+19YzMHt8cT3Ns XaEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=KigW2hgPNH1Wr1nLOyW5qdpU2gvEOlj6U/O367Yp/xU=; fh=pizz9HUn939HHLJCii2f8JuenEZRPR2RKqqGXAa22N8=; b=VyqNHUnhkpGMU9/iaqWsjoEB/2kKTLZpXBDEEV1s1sRTb0YJq82UaHgTVxrD7GHbdd RsjPG6K2GoQ8Sj+vFCxWLFaaVYmUO6+X7KuG71JUZoRwp+G4doKR/so7l6MB0tIBfMN9 szMvWuL1kZ615Yma/TKGlw7Oj6bMeODXArfQbMp0JSDp5KavamB1YULQYKaOj3Ge9MEW Y3iASQIs19ICscEQ1LiJ+ApI8B6RNzXpws9h4vVSgHR9t+/xpuCgm+LMsxei9ZpPALr9 yxoASu1KsxXF9opzdNx27BeZvU+uEMpebtSqh2yE9hMxPa9pBO8sTsqDMjg3gbQLJgMp U8og==; darn=ietf.org ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1771376551; x=1771981351; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KigW2hgPNH1Wr1nLOyW5qdpU2gvEOlj6U/O367Yp/xU=; b=KbdrOTDjel+GJDbBeMwYlpuYQEzVmgszIWfrG4+fLw+PHhkhmuPtqcLkCznrOZ0KsV 05hx03u89pOBmSqqsmZ5rVcXM6RWh3DW/djAbu09PPKaHC0iYZOfMTTsLlnelFk4DBqO VN1eKc5qe8nI2j1UNfxJM47k1POhovnuICJgBJxpBdHkdeo3fxmSW3U9RO5eJxNdViyQ V8+fvJ07gkVuBZRrQY9/orNCJDobRoXACVtHqo9pOUxfDOBEEPPaETuOo2NYDLDn8UZZ N3oTNsyR97C398i/9qrZgz+BOneIQR3jrz02J3Q7KNUjt0QB2QfuVDcNC1gDupzEabXV GWIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1771376551; x=1771981351; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KigW2hgPNH1Wr1nLOyW5qdpU2gvEOlj6U/O367Yp/xU=; b=hh7MmBc0WbGeJeCTA3aFGxS98NtoH7/Fo1w2Vpx9ZQBlBM3YHv1RmzEZadnd7b7Yze 89qvvaSa3TZLsdZU82HuP37AgiSKENEVZtx8MrH8goSB1Oy6MasFv3FN+1QtstPx/Kcq dgfY2imA5+zGI11p/e2wg3J4DfaZNaQK6wcCb2v9cNVvU6X1B0OOs5xsC7ZbjKtq3rS0 lOxqU2abq5QEwzKbQJmtqjrMNAQToUoREFLT1m89i5LG3jSuo0oHw0oX/vZwTjcS+Et4 HjEnFT684g2VtYIa90kjiiGqRNbb2SAsL7FNe8UCOqrJlamvgK194A6ap27k27sdPGWT HHNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwxfRmEhu8TCFr7mcpS45Xz+XmaaV5oMVaQpu3l99ZGS/n+KgbD EXlPKXAxGPO2v/dT50eovxiJP05oUMCO4wprmFDx3DNiMzxG8WSsR5ykDSe8ug+gZS43zjBNM3I hC13LZrpKMPtJoweMwJyMJa00JI2n23jnBg== X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aILvtwRjgEDh/ArhGNusdQIrbwbVPykL6rLve5TvW+pWPql5LPmAwCiRUwwjXN 9HFLVMz3qBNeiYeDTFS2yO4hBAg8BqKOBqMXSznTN8+CvJBtEbOIAK9wZ751hCRzLHIOU9BOros HKYK7W6g7SlNTmDrR0xmGm2Bg367SQIbG0MDUqg4NMcqGON9ID7d/soAll8aPuMMeRmX4jIkSeM AP6P9flbA3CEqyHws8h6qp3Vq4vmp0KImbfsrJ9URD3ubku2lcPY7SuNgx2fykaYKfEm8pl5xvX GTEJYvAkOieCcC4+XzdIAwecncBdNjxwopPCFSkzdzx9kTJRH6bg1PXNLiXmbo4tsHdPD07i0V1 VSYs0DYEntzLPTA93kDWWePrDhA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:7118:b0:8cb:2732:81ef with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8cb740481a4mr42558585a.35.1771376550423; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:02:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <176952380294.1103854.4955381603882889475@dt-datatracker-77f8b84995-z4hzn> In-Reply-To: From: Shivan Kaul Sahib Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:01:54 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AaiRm50ouz9vXiNcJUQ9Zi-srXE040XsMOtEaCDWRDWaPeD4QHWevM0Y7lWEctI Message-ID: To: Prachi Jain Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d2fe3064b0ebe9c" Message-ID-Hash: ZHDYIBWYV7JTYL43HCGUMHJQILJOHLFJ X-Message-ID-Hash: ZHDYIBWYV7JTYL43HCGUMHJQILJOHLFJ X-MailFrom: shivankaul.1993@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: keytrans@ietf.org, keytrans-chairs@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BKeytrans=5D_Re=3A_WG_Last_Call=3A_draft-ietf-keytrans-architect?= =?utf-8?q?ure-06_=28Ends_2026-02-10=29?= List-Id: Key Transparency Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --0000000000000d2fe3064b0ebe9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, apologies for the delay here, the chairs were busy gathering feedback. We've consulted with our AD, and given the comments (+ no objections) we've received during WGLC, we believe there is consensus for the architecture draft to proceed. Brendan, please upload a new I-D addressing comments that were received. On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 6:39=E2=80=AFAM Prachi Jain wrote: > Hello All, > > As decided during the KEYTRANS session at IETF 124, the authors have > published a revision of the architecture document. The document *draft-ie= tf-keytrans-architecture > * is > now ready for the Working Group Last Call. > > > If anyone on the list has concerns or believes there is a reason not to > advance this document at this time, please raise them on the mailing list > as soon as possible. > > Thanks, > Chairs > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 8:23=E2=80=AFAM Prachi Jain via Datatracker < > noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > >> This message starts a WG Last Call for: >> draft-ietf-keytrans-architecture-06 >> >> This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-02-10 >> >> Abstract: >> This document defines the terminology and interaction patterns >> involved in the deployment of Key Transparency in a general secure >> group messaging infrastructure, and specifies the security properties >> that the protocol provides. It also gives more general, non- >> prescriptive guidance on how to securely apply Key Transparency to a >> number of common applications. >> >> File can be retrieved from: >> >> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the >> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping >> keytrans@ietf.org in copy. Objections should be explained and >> suggestions to >> resolve them are highly appreciated. >> >> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectua= l >> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. >> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the >> provisions >> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. >> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can = be >> found at [3]. >> >> Thank you. >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ >> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ >> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-keytrans-architecture/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-keytrans-architecture-06.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-keytrans-architec= ture-06 >> > --0000000000000d2fe3064b0ebe9c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all, apologies for the delay here, the chairs were busy= gathering feedback.=C2=A0

We've consulted with our = AD, and given the comments (+ no objections) we've received during WGLC= , we believe there is consensus for the architecture draft to proceed.=C2= =A0

Brendan, please=C2=A0upload a new I-D addressi= ng comments that were received.

On Tue, Jan 27, = 2026 at 6:39=E2=80=AFAM Prachi Jain <prachi.jain1288@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello All,

As decided during th= e KEYTRANS session at IETF 124, the authors have published a revision of th= e architecture document. The document draft-ietf-k= eytrans-architecture is now ready for the Working Group Last Call.<= /p>


If anyone on the list has concerns or b= elieves there is a reason not to advance this document at this time, please= raise them on the mailing list as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Chai= rs



On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 8:23=E2=80=AFAM Pr= achi Jain via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
This message starts a WG Last Call for:
draft-ietf-keytrans-architecture-06

This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-02-10

Abstract:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0This document defines the terminology and interaction patterns=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0involved in the deployment of Key Transparency in a general se= cure
=C2=A0 =C2=A0group messaging infrastructure, and specifies the security pro= perties
=C2=A0 =C2=A0that the protocol provides.=C2=A0 It also gives more general, = non-
=C2=A0 =C2=A0prescriptive guidance on how to securely apply Key Transparenc= y to a
=C2=A0 =C2=A0number of common applications.

File can be retrieved from:

Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping
keytrans@ietf.org in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to
resolve them are highly appreciated.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisio= ns
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be<= br> found at [3].

Thank you.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d= raft-ietf-keytrans-architecture/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive= /id/draft-ietf-keytrans-architecture-06.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.= ietf.org/iddiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-keytrans-architecture-06
--0000000000000d2fe3064b0ebe9c--