[08:57:44] hi all! [09:00:10] hi [09:00:20] oh hai [09:01:20] Hey everyone [09:04:24] hai hai [09:05:51] ok [09:06:00] so - it seems like the big thing is getting 1.6.4 out? [09:06:50] yep [09:06:56] dave's not around? [09:07:05] yeah, dave mentioned being on a plane today [09:07:09] k [09:08:12] I thought everything was set up for 1.6.4 or am I missing something? [09:08:24] maybe? I'm out of the loop here [09:08:57] well, I know it was mainly about the support bug in xhtml mode [09:09:05] ok [09:09:09] so should I push the release then? [09:09:15] 1.6.4 is ready [09:09:17] I believe so [09:09:30] ok, I'll do that today then [09:09:31] \o/ [09:09:34] thank you [09:09:41] In minor news [09:10:15] After considerable discussion, I've decided to defer event property hooks to 1.8 [09:10:21] too much is happening in events for 1.7 [09:10:23] rwaldron: fffuuuu [09:10:28] that was an awesome one [09:10:32] heh [09:10:39] why the delay? [09:10:50] Dave and I discussed it pretty thoroughly [09:10:54] you fear you may break too much stuff? [09:11:00] basically [09:11:07] with all of his changes to event [09:11:12] well, I'll break it to you: you will :P [09:11:18] in 1.7 or 1.8 alike ;) [09:11:19] we're just inviting problems [09:11:23] rwaldron: how would it break stuff, isn't it just an abstraction? [09:11:38] Not that I think it will break stuff [09:11:40] right now we just have a massive code blob in the event fix stuff [09:11:49] just that there is so much else going on in events [09:11:50] heh [09:12:01] If you think I should push through, I will [09:12:13] I'm with John on this one, let's put the hooks in while we're at it [09:12:26] Ok, it's on then [09:12:31] I tihnk i just need to hear that [09:12:34] thanks [09:12:36] :) [09:12:44] it makes it actually easier given you have Dave deep into it and he can help you with it [09:12:45] yeah, if we're doing a rewrite of events it makes a ton of sense to do it at the same time [09:12:54] ok [09:13:02] hey timmy :) [09:13:02] i was just worried that it was like, too much at once [09:13:09] sry im late, hi [09:13:18] but, this is good to hear [09:13:55] rwaldron: well, it may seem like much, but in the end, it's about refreshing the event module... it doesn't really make sense to keep the ugly hardcoded fixes [09:14:12] yeah [09:14:36] if it's ok with everyone, I want to start merging everything together on a separate branch tonight [09:14:47] timmywil: I'm down with that [09:15:02] timmy: good luck my friend, my thoughts are with you :) [09:15:08] * jaubourg hides [09:15:12] timmywil +1 [09:15:14] jaubourg: can you rebase your Callbacks branch with master? [09:15:19] done [09:15:21] cool [09:15:28] 1.7/Callbacks-sept11 [09:15:31] that's pretty much all i was worried about [09:15:36] timmywil: im working on rebasing all my 1.7 pulls right now [09:15:37] I just restarted it on top of current [09:15:58] applied the progress/notify naming convention in the process [09:16:07] perfect [09:16:10] I kept $.Topic in but it's easy enough to take it out [09:16:20] gnarf: thanks! [09:16:43] jaubourg: that's the pub/sub stuff? [09:16:47] yep [09:17:30] I love it, but I think I'd prefer to keep it as a plugin for now [09:17:47] yeah, I just wanted to keep track of it given I killed the old branch [09:17:56] (so that no one would merge the old one in by accident) [09:18:36] gotcha, maybe you could make pull it out before I merge it tho [09:18:50] so i don't mess anything up [09:19:34] I'll be out this evening... I need to set up a repo for $.Topic so that we can point people to it come 1.7 [09:19:47] not sure I'll have time to handle it before you merge [09:20:15] it's just topic.js in src and unit and the reference to it in the makefile [09:20:28] ah ok, i can take care of it then [09:20:35] and all the indexes for iframe test and index.html in test [09:20:39] the usual [09:20:56] completely separate from the rest thankfully [09:21:31] OR, you can keep it in and we sneak it passed everyone and take over the world... bwuhahahahahahahah! [09:21:36] * jaubourg hides in his villain's lair [09:21:43] lol [09:22:02] well, if the team wants to vote on it today....http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7547 [09:22:08] link http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7547 [09:22:24] nah, it's a bit late for a last minute feature methinks [09:22:28] would be nice but still [09:22:46] ok, well it will be nice to give it a trial as a plugin as well [09:22:50] timmywil: I thought we voted on that for 1.7 already? [09:22:52] then maybe 1.8 [09:22:55] yep, my thought exactly [09:23:11] JohnResig: yes, we voted against inclusion in core [09:23:14] JohnResig: it wasn't part of the 1.7 list [09:23:24] now we have a plugin based on Callbacks [09:23:25] but we did get some votes anyway [09:23:32] we voted against pub/sub in general iirc [09:23:37] ^^ [09:23:53] we did, but desnt your callback queue give it to us for free? [09:24:11] well, it's still bigger than ben's event based proposal [09:24:14] not quite free, but shorter than any previous pub/sub i've seen [09:24:21] or is it? [09:24:28] but yeah, plugin, for sure [09:24:41] anyway, it's the first one I saw that was dojo compatible from an interface point of view [09:24:50] yep [09:25:14] JohnResig: you get a chance to review any of the sizzle stuff? [09:25:25] timmywil: nope, not yet [09:25:43] review plz? why has it been renames timmzle? [09:25:44] it's four lines in sizzle and 2 in sizze-jquery.js [09:25:55] haha [09:26:00] lol [09:26:04] :) [09:26:15] but LOTS more tests [09:27:13] im going to hammer sizzle in 1.8 :) [09:27:24] :) [09:28:11] why do I get an image of rappers from the 80s when I read this sentence? [09:28:27] fo shizzle [09:28:32] yo [09:29:45] alright, we all set? [09:29:51] yep [09:30:45] I'm good [09:30:55] k, thanks everyone! [09:31:00] JohnResig just to recap, you'll push out 1.6.4? [09:31:03] thanks [09:31:13] rwaldron: yep [09:31:16] awesome [09:31:19] Thanks! [09:31:21] =) [09:31:24] * rwaldron runs to -dev [09:31:36] JohnResig: i'll be online most of the day if you get a chance to take a look [09:31:54] k!